Racket | Karakal Raw Pro 2.0 |
Endorsed by | Joel Makin |
Shape | Teardrop |
Advertised frame weight | 120 grams |
Actual weight (inc. strings & grip) | 153 grams |
String | Karakal Hot Zone 120 |
Grip | Karakal PU |
Stringing pattern | 14 x 18 |
Construction | Karakal NexGen Fast Fibre |
Release date | February 2022 |
Price at launch | £120 |
Purchase | Amazon | PDH Sports |
In mid-2021, British-based brand Karakal announced their latest major signing – none other than the UK #1 – Joel Makin, the ‘Golden Tiger’.
Karakal is synonymous with squash players from the UK, with Makin now stepping in as the cherry on icing on the cake for their pro-player line-up.
After signing for Karakal, Joel briefly used their ‘Core Pro’ racket. Soon after, he was seen playing with an unpainted racket for around six months, presumably testing out various iterations of their brand-new frame.
In February this year, Karakal then revealed Joel Makin’s squash racket – the Raw Pro 2.0.
Purchase links:
Amazon
PDH Sports
Joel Makin’s squash racket – at a glance
The Raw Pro 2.0 is marketed as a 120g racket, with a fairly dense 14×18 stringing pattern and large 480cm squared head size.
It features a black and blue colour scheme, with Joel Makin’s name sitting just beneath the throat of the racket.
The main feature of this racket is Karakal’s ‘NexGen Fast Fibre’ – a Graphite construction which claims to offer significantly faster rebound properties (how quick the racket returns to shape after impact) than the current range of Karakal rackets.
The racket comes pre-gripped with a Karakal PU Grip – the yellow variant of this grip is arguably one of the best on the market, and used by tons of professional players, so it’s great to see it come as standard on the Raw Pro 2.0.
And yes, the colour of a grip really does make a difference. Try going from a black to a yellow Karakal grip – the yellow grip feels tackier, less rigid and more squishy (technical term!), and also seems to last much longer too.
Speaking of the grip, this is the first pro-grade Karakal racket to feature an oval grip shape, as opposed to the hexagonal shape found on the majority of their frames – a design specifically chosen by Joel Makin.
Closest competitors
The obvious competitor here undoubtedly the Tecnifibre Carboflex. Anyone familiar with the Heritage or X-Speed Carboflex 125 rackets will feel immediately at home.
The racket shares a similar mould to these rackets, and features very similar playing characteristics – but more on that later.
Other similar rackets in this space are Unsquashable’s Y-Tec Pro, Ashaway’s Powerkill Meta XBC, Dunlop’s Revelation 125, and Head’s Speed 120SB.
On the scales
While the Karakal Raw 2.0 is marketed as a 120g racket, this is its frame weight, and therefore doesn’t include its strings and grip.
Putting a racket across two scales – one under the head, one under the grip – reveals a lot about how a racket will feel in practice.
Karakal’s latest racket returned some really interesting results. At 153g overall, it’s a light-to-medium weight racket, in line with most rackets advertised as having a 125g frame weight.
However, this is an ultra-head-light racket, with just 51% (78g) of its weight in the head of the frame. This means, in theory, it should feel very manoeuvrable on court.
Racket | Weight in head | Weight in grip | Overall | Weight distribution |
Karakal Raw Pro 2.0 Joel Makin | 78 | 76 | 153 | 51.0% |
Dunlop Sonic Core Revelation 125 | 79 | 73 | 152 | 52.0% |
Head Speed SB120 (2021) | 78 | 66 | 144 | 54.2% |
Ashaway Powerkill Meta XBC | 75 | 63 | 138 | 54.3% |
Tecnifibre Carboflex Airshaft 125 | 85 | 70 | 155 | 54.8% |
In practice: How does the Karakal Raw Pro 2.0 perform?
Manoeuvrability: 9/10
One thing I didn’t expect before weighing the racket was just how manoeuvrable it would feel. Having just 78g of weight at the head of the frame helps this racket to fly through the air. This means preparing your racket, taking the ball early and hunting the volley is an absolute breeze (perfectly suited to Joel Makin’s game).
Players who enjoy adding deception to their swing will also have a blast with this racket. The head light balance allows you to use a shorter swing and generate racket-head speed much faster.
Coincidentally, this is the same head-weight as Head’s Speed 120SB, however, having a little more weight in the grip helps Karakal’s racket feel slightly more head-light.
Power: 7/10
I felt like I could generate plenty of power with the Raw Pro 2.0. However, compared to other rackets, I felt like I had to hit the ball a little harder/use a faster racket-head speed to find the back of the court. This is to be expected with a head-light racket though, so nothing out of the ordinary here.
Now, I do have a strong suspicion that a restring at a lower tension would work wonders. I found Karakal’s stock strings were on the extra-tight side. Tighter string-beds tend to have more control but less power, as a rule of thumb.
It’s worth pointing out that almost all brands string their rackets from factory this tight for a reason, as they can naturally lose tension after sitting on a shelf/in storage for a long time.
On a semi-related note, the thickness of the logo-paint used on the strings felt fairly excessive until it wore away after a few hours of play. As above, most brands are guilty of doing this, so it’s not just an issue specific to Karakal. Again, a total non-issue as a restring would completely resolve this.
Stringer Paul Reilly shared an image of Joel’s rackets on the Squash Stories Facebook group. They’re strung with Karakal Hot Zone at 24lbs.
Touch, control and feel: 8.5/10
A dense 14×18 stringing pattern, combined with a lightweight, head-light frame help to give this racket plenty of control. People who enjoy the feel of Carboflex rackets will undoubtedly get along well with the Raw Pro 2.0 from Karakal.
Much like the Carboflex, the Raw Pro 2.0 features a very stiff frame, with Karakal stating that the premium-grade graphite construction enables the racket return to shape extremely quickly after impact with the ball.
I particularly enjoyed taking the ball in short with this racket, where I felt I was really able to manoeuvre the racket head to place the ball exactly where I wanted on the front wall.
Consistency: 7.5/10
On the whole, I felt comfortable using the Karakal Raw Pro 2.0, which helped me to play a very accurate game. However, due in-part to the stiff frame and dense stringing pattern, the sweet spot from the strings did feel a little on the small-side. When I didn’t hit the ball dead-centre from the stringbed, I felt it made a somewhat noticeable difference to my shots. Again, a lower string tension will help resolve this.
Design: 7/10
As ever, design is subjective. I love the shape of this racket, with the black and blue paint helping the slimbody frame to look really sleek.
The graphics on the racket do get a little ‘busy’, with a fair few words and graphics dotted around the frame. I personally prefer the simplicity of Karakal’s budget version of this racket, the Raw 120. Of course, that’s just my own opinion, you’re free to make up your own mind here!
Overall
I’m conscious I’ve spent a lot of time comparing this racket to the Tecnifibre Carboflex, however given the number of players using that frame and the similarities these rackets share, it makes putting this racket into words far easier.
So, take a Carboflex, shave some weight from the head and add a little weight to the grip, and in essence you have the Karakal Raw Pro 2.0. Both rackets share roughly the same shape, stringing pattern, stiffness and playing characteristics. If you like the Carboflex but would like a little more manoeuvrability, this could be the perfect racket for you.
This is undoubtedly a racket that will suit a broad variety of players. It’s the typical ‘modern frame’ that most players are now favouring, and it’s therefore a racket that’s hard to go wrong with and very easy to recommend.
I’m looking forward to trying out some lower-tensioned strings in this racket, as I imagine this will really help realise the full potential of the Raw Pro 2.0.
Purchase links:
Amazon
PDH Sports
Thanks for the review.
Do you happen to have the head and grip weight for the carboflex 125s?
That’s the one Carboflex that’s evaded my kit bag unfortunately!
Great review.
You mentioned that string tension of this racket is on the extra-tight side. What tension would you suggest (in kg)?
Thank you! In answer to your question, I think it all depends what you like. I tend to go a little lower than average when it comes to tension in my own rackets – generally around 24lbs ( ~11kg), though I have had tighter in the past. Joel strings his at 24lbs too, and I’ve noticed a lot of pro players going for this tension in their rackets. You do get a bit more movement in your strings though which can be annoying, especially if you have a more textured string like many Ashaway variants (you find yourself moving the strings back into place between points).
It’s worth trying a few different tensions until you find your ideal setup 😊
Rob
Great review.
Thorough and enough to make you swap rackets with confidence.
Richard.
Hi, i was curious if you were planning on doing some Harrow reviews in the future?
Would love to, but their limited availability and high cost in the UK (my primary audience) makes it a real challenge to get my hands on them – hopefully this will change in the near future!
Great review! Would love to hear your thoughts on the Unsquashable range if you can get your hands on them. They’ve just opened up an Amazon store in the US with some pretty competitive prices on a handful of their rackets.
Hi whats the durability like on these frames
Hi Joe, hard to say as I’ve not put it through its paces in terms of durability. Feels very similar to older Carboflex rackets so I’d hope it’s similar (i.e. Very good), but without cracking it against a wall 100 times it’s hard to give a definitive – sorry not the best answer, hope that helps somewhat though!
Just a quick update on the durability of this racket. Within 1.5 year I cracked e of them.
2 of them broke in the shaft – just snapped, and one of them bottom of the frame (due to the contact with other player).
p.s.
I switched to Raw 2.0 after playing Tecnifibre Carboflex series for about 5 years, where I managed to crack just one racket.
Hi, thanks for this review.
I’d really love if you would compare this racket to its lighter version, the Karakal Raw Pro lite 2.0.
Any noticeable difference between this and the budget version in terms of feel and playability?
Hi! Great review. I can’t fork out the money right now for this one so I’ve been looking at the Karakal Crystal 120. Do you have any thoughts on/experience with this racket?
Super nice advice on this one.
Joel Makin Karakal Raw Pro 2.0 wins the Canada Open. 🏆🏆🏆👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻